nats-io/nats.py #1043 ↗
Keeps explicit passwords intact when NATS clients authenticate with signed JWT and NKey credentials.
Maintainer approved · 28 checks passed. Merged .
One-page recruiting evidence · Bengaluru, India
Software Engineer II at Cisco | Backend & Distributed Systems | Go, Java, PostgreSQL, Kubernetes
Seeking backend, platform, and service infrastructure opportunities in India. Experience spans Go/Java services, messaging, release readiness, and Kubernetes operations.
Reviewed upstream work
Keeps explicit passwords intact when NATS clients authenticate with signed JWT and NKey credentials.
Maintainer approved · 28 checks passed. Merged .
Restores the activation time of firing alerts with short for durations across restart, allowing firing to resume on the next scheduled evaluation while preserving pending-alert grace behavior.
Maintainer approved · 39 checks passed. Merged .
Flagship · Runnable Lab
Separate Go submission API, transactional-outbox dispatcher, and RabbitMQ workers. PostgreSQL records accepted jobs, bounded attempts, terminal status, and one durable result per job.
Real-service tests cover known helper-process exits, broker restart, duplicates, and database rollback. Corrected local measurements retain every trial and include observation/polling overhead; this is a single-host synthetic lab.
Across twelve 1,000-job trials with 1/2/4/8 independent workers: 262.73–323.21 jobs/s and 95.43–151.08 ms observed p95. All measured jobs completed. Polling is approximately 50 ms plus query/sampling overhead; the run does not demonstrate linear scaling.
The historical 10,000-job result is an in-memory functional run, separate from the external-path evidence.
Inspect the case study →Watch the 90-second recovery demo ↗
The video is a captioned replay of actual agent-executed terminal output, not learner narration. Its 5.119233-second Compose/broker recovery is a separate trial from the corrected benchmark receipt.
Recovery evidence · Runnable Lab
Four actual SIGKILL drills on pinned public data restore the exact six-step model, optimizer, RNG, and history state of an independent CPU control.
The interactive replay explains a committed report. It is a tiny local CPU proof at known failure boundaries, with no distributed-training or power-loss claim.
Open the recovery replay →Relevant professional record
Software Engineer II since September 2025; Software Engineer from August 2024 to September 2025; internship January–June 2024. Public summaries cover backend implementation, regression validation, and service reliability.
Read the experience record →